πŸ“‹ Case Study

High-Rise Residential Tower in San Francisco

Meeting stringent SDC D requirements while minimizing column sizes in tight urban footprint

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

32-story reinforced concrete tower with podium parking and seismic base isolation

🎯 Challenge

Meeting stringent SDC D requirements while minimizing column sizes in tight urban footprint

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Special moment-resisting frames with ductile detailing per ACI 21.4; performance-based pushover analysis

πŸ“ Design Diagram

High-Rise Residential Tower β€” San Francisco Urban Site (Tight Footprint) Core SMRF SMRF ΞΈβ‚š = 0.022 rad (ACI 21.4.4.2) Ξ£Mβ‚™c / Ξ£Mβ‚™b = 1.38 β‰₯ 1.2 SDC D Requirement Core SMRF Hinge Zone Challenge

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

Column Plastic Hinge Rotation Capacity

ΞΈp = 0.02 rad (ACI 21.4.4.2)
Result: 0.022 rad
Ensures life safety under MCE event

Beam-Column Strength Ratio (Ξ£Mnc/Ξ£Mnb)

β‰₯ 1.2
Result: 1.38
Prevents soft-story collapse mechanism

πŸ“Š Results

Achieved drift < 1.5% under DBE; 12% reduction in core column volume vs conventional design

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Ductile detailing must be verified at connection zonesβ€”not just member level
  • β€’Pushover modeling requires calibrated hinge properties from lab-tested specimens

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Ductile detailing must be verified at connection zonesβ€”not just member level
  • 2Pushover modeling requires calibrated hinge properties from lab-tested specimens