π Case Study
High-Rise Residential Tower in San Francisco
Meeting stringent SDC D requirements while minimizing column sizes in tight urban footprint
ποΈ Project Overview
32-story reinforced concrete tower with podium parking and seismic base isolation
π― Challenge
Meeting stringent SDC D requirements while minimizing column sizes in tight urban footprint
π§ Design Approach
Special moment-resisting frames with ductile detailing per ACI 21.4; performance-based pushover analysis
π Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
π Key Calculations
Column Plastic Hinge Rotation Capacity
ΞΈp = 0.02 rad (ACI 21.4.4.2)
Result: 0.022 rad
Ensures life safety under MCE event
Beam-Column Strength Ratio (Ξ£Mnc/Ξ£Mnb)
β₯ 1.2
Result: 1.38
Prevents soft-story collapse mechanism
π Results
Achieved drift < 1.5% under DBE; 12% reduction in core column volume vs conventional designπ‘ Lessons Learned
- β’Ductile detailing must be verified at connection zonesβnot just member level
- β’Pushover modeling requires calibrated hinge properties from lab-tested specimens
β Key Takeaways
- 1Ductile detailing must be verified at connection zonesβnot just member level
- 2Pushover modeling requires calibrated hinge properties from lab-tested specimens