📋 Case Study

High-Rise Foundation Design on Residual Lateritic Soil

Highly variable residual soil depth (2–12 m), low bearing capacity, and potential for post-construction desiccation cracking

🏗️ Project Overview

42-story mixed-use tower in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

🎯 Challenge

Highly variable residual soil depth (2–12 m), low bearing capacity, and potential for post-construction desiccation cracking

🔧 Design Approach

Deep dynamic compaction + grouted micropiles socketed into bedrock; continuous moisture monitoring during construction

📐 Design Diagram

Lateritic Soil Layer (2–12 m depth)Bedrock (Socketing Zone)Desiccation Crack Risk ZoneDynamic Compaction GridSoil densificationMicropile socketingqₐ = 245 kPaδ = 18 mmPI×Clay = 128Variable Depth (2–12 m)Residual Soil

📐 Key Calculations

Allowable bearing capacity (qₐ)

qᵤ / FS = cNc + qNq + 0.5γBNγ
Result: 245 kPa
Micropile group spacing optimized

Settlement prediction via Schmertmann method

δ = Σ(Δσᵢ × Iᵢ × zᵢ / Eₛᵢ)
Result: 18 mm
Met serviceability limit of 25 mm

Shrink-swell potential index (PI × %clay)

PI × Clay Content
Result: 128
Triggered moisture control protocol

📊 Results

Measured settlement: 16.2 mm at 12 months; no distress observed in superstructure

💡 Lessons Learned

  • Residual soils require site-specific N-values—not generic correlations
  • Moisture control during curing prevented surface cracking

Key Takeaways

  • 1Residual soils require site-specific N-values—not generic correlations
  • 2Moisture control during curing prevented surface cracking