๐ Case Study
Historic Masonry Bridge Retrofit on Alluvial Floodplain
Low-density floodplain deposits (OCR ~1.2), high seasonal water table, and risk of scour undermining abutments
๐๏ธ Project Overview
Seismic retrofit of 1892 stone arch bridge over Mississippi tributary in Missouri
๐ฏ Challenge
Low-density floodplain deposits (OCR ~1.2), high seasonal water table, and risk of scour undermining abutments
๐ง Design Approach
Mini-pile underpinning + graded filter blanket + real-time piezometer network; phased load transfer verified by strain gauges
๐ Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
๐ Key Calculations
Ultimate skin friction (qโ)
qโ = ฮฑ ร cแตค (ฮฑ = 0.55 for mini-piles)
Result: 110 kPa
Defined pile length requirement
Scour critical velocity (V๊)
V๊ = K ร (g ร Dโ
โ)โฐยทโต
Result: 1.82 m/s
Informed flow training structure geometry
Settlement under dead load (Schmertmann)
ฮด = ฮฃ(ฮฯ ร I ร ฮz / Eโ)
Result: 8.3 mm
Below allowable 10 mm tolerance
๐ Results
Completed within historic preservation constraints; monitored settlement < 0.3 mm/year post-retrofit๐ก Lessons Learned
- โขMini-piles minimized vibration impact on historic masonry
- โขGraded filters prevented internal erosion despite frequent saturation cycles
โ Key Takeaways
- 1Mini-piles minimized vibration impact on historic masonry
- 2Graded filters prevented internal erosion despite frequent saturation cycles