土木工程
ToolFusion / Borehole Optical Televiewer / Engineering Tools

Project Tool: Structural orientation analysis of rock discontinuities using borehole optical televiewer (OPTV) logs

Specification & Integration Verification

F6 Composition for Structural orientation analysis of rock discontinuities using borehole optical televiewer (OPTV) logs

● Not Golden Verified ● Project Trust Verified Runnable: 0 / 2 steps
VERIFIED SCOPE
○ Compute intersection line orientation of two discontinuity planes CALCULATION Manual Workflow
○ Assess wedge daylighting and sliding potential against slope face and friction cone CALCULATION Manual Workflow
⚠ This tool does not currently verify Borehole-Geometry-Driven Image Rectification, Geologically-Aware Contrast Enhancement, OPTV-Specific Artifact Suppression, Planar-Intersection-Optimized Edge Detection, Trace-to-Plane Back-Projection, Persistence Estimation from Trace Geometry, Discontinuity Morphometric Feature Extraction, Stereonet-Based Discontinuity Clustering, Structural Input to Rock Mass Classification.
PROJECT INPUTS

Runnable deterministic steps: 0 / 2. Enter the project conditions used by this verification workflow. Prefilled values (10/10 inputs) are demonstration inputs, not recommended design values.

01Step 1: Compute intersection line orientation of two discontinuit...Manual Workflow
deg
deg
deg
deg
02Step 2: Assess wedge daylighting and sliding potential against sl...Manual Workflow
deg
deg
deg
deg
deg
deg

⚠ Runnable deterministic steps: 0 / 2. Steps marked "Input Required" or "Example Input Required" need user-provided engineering values before calculation.

ENGINEERING WORKFLOW GUIDE
This workflow contains no executable calculation steps. Review the engineering methods below.
ToolFusion Engineering Network

ToolFusion Engineering Network

Access thousands of engineering calculators, standards, and design tools. Join the ToolFusion network for comprehensive engineering resources.

Explore ToolFusion

ENGINEERING EVIDENCE

Golden Coverage0 / 2
Project Trust11 / 11 PASS
RuntimeDeterministic
Components0 small tools, 2 steps

SCOPE & LIMITATIONS

NOT CURRENTLY VERIFIED
○ Borehole-Geometry-Driven Image Rectification
○ Geologically-Aware Contrast Enhancement
○ OPTV-Specific Artifact Suppression
○ Planar-Intersection-Optimized Edge Detection
○ Trace-to-Plane Back-Projection
○ Persistence Estimation from Trace Geometry
○ Discontinuity Morphometric Feature Extraction
○ Stereonet-Based Discontinuity Clustering
○ Structural Input to Rock Mass Classification
These capabilities are outside the current verified workflow.

HOW THIS VERIFICATION WORKS

  1. Step 1: Compute intersection line orientation of two discontinuity planes — engineering workflow step. Follow the documented method for manual execution.
  2. Step 2: Assess wedge daylighting and sliding potential against slope face and friction cone — engineering workflow step. Follow the documented method for manual execution.

This tool coordinates 0 validation steps and 2 calculation steps. The overall engineering decision uses ALL_REQUIRED_VALIDATION_PASS aggregation: only validation steps contribute to the pass/fail outcome; calculation steps produce data only.

METHODS & EQUATIONS

All formulas are resolved from canonical runtime definitions and executed deterministically by the client-side engine.

Step 1: Compute intersection line orientation of two discontinuity planes

Manual Workflow
ρ = arcsin(|n₁ × n₂|), where nᵢ = [sinδᵢ cosαᵢ, sinδᵢ sinαᵢ, cosδᵢ] are unit normals; the magnitude of the cross product yields sin(ρ), giving the plunge of the intersection line.

Step 2: Assess wedge daylighting and sliding potential against slope face and friction cone

Manual Workflow
1. Compute angular distance between intersection line trend/plunge and slope face pole: if ≤ 90°−δ_f → daylighting possible. 2. Compute acute angle γ between intersection line and third plane: γ = 90° − |ρ − δ₃| if trends align within ±20°, else use vector dot product. If γ < φ → sliding feasible. Wedge is kinematically admissible iff both conditions hold.

UNDERSTANDING THE RESULTS

PASS
A proven validation criterion passed. The engineering input satisfies the deterministic threshold.
FAIL
A proven validation criterion failed. The engineering input does not satisfy the deterministic threshold.
CALCULATED
A deterministic calculation completed, but no acceptance criterion exists for this step. CALCULATED does NOT mean PASS.
RESULT NOT VALID
Runtime executed but engineering validity requirements were not met.
INCOMPLETE
Required inputs or workflow steps are incomplete.

The overall decision reflects only validation steps. Calculation steps produce numerical results without pass/fail claims.

WHEN TO USE THIS TOOL

  • When deterministic Borehole Optical Televiewer engineering verification is needed for project-specific conditions.
  • For calculation of Compute intersection line orientation of two discontinuity planes (Step 1).
  • For calculation of Assess wedge daylighting and sliding potential against slope face and friction cone (Step 2).
  • For deterministic pre-checks before formal engineering review or submission.

When NOT to use this tool: This tool does not replace laboratory testing, formal engineering analysis by a licensed professional, or code-compliance certification. It performs deterministic threshold comparison and calculation only.

ENGINEERING FAQ

What does this verification tool check?

This tool performs 2 deterministic engineering steps: (1) Compute intersection line orientation of two discontinuity planes, (2) Assess wedge daylighting and sliding potential against slope face and friction cone.

What does a CALCULATED result mean?

A CALCULATED result means the deterministic calculation completed, but no acceptance criterion is applied to this step. CALCULATED does NOT mean PASS.

What is not currently verified by this workflow?

Capabilities not currently verified include: Borehole-Geometry-Driven Image Rectification, Geologically-Aware Contrast Enhancement, OPTV-Specific Artifact Suppression, Planar-Intersection-Optimized Edge Detection, Trace-to-Plane Back-Projection.

How many steps are golden verified?

0 out of 2 steps have been verified with deterministic golden test cases.

COMPONENT TOOLS

This workflow currently contains no bound executable Small Tools. Steps are defined by engineering methods and reference materials.

CalculationWorkflow StepWedge failure feasibility check using three-plane intersection geometry
CalculationWorkflow StepWedge failure feasibility check using three-plane intersection geometry

RELATED ENGINEERING WORKFLOWS