πŸ“‹ Case Study

Mountainous Ski Resort Stormwater Retrofit in Aspen, CO

Preventing erosion and sediment delivery to Roaring Fork River (Class I trout stream) under high-intensity snowmelt pulses and freeze-thaw cycles

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

Upgrading 1970s-era concrete channels on 32Β° slopes serving base village and parking lots

🎯 Challenge

Preventing erosion and sediment delivery to Roaring Fork River (Class I trout stream) under high-intensity snowmelt pulses and freeze-thaw cycles

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Rock-lined stepped chutes with energy dissipators, bioswales with cold-tolerant vegetation (Carex spp.), and sediment basins with vortex separators

πŸ“ Design Diagram

Mountainous Ski Resort Stormwater Retrofit β€” Aspen, COV_max = 21.3 ft/sRock-lined stepped chuteBioswale (Carex spp.)Cold-tolerantSediment basint_d = 4.8 minVortex separatorRoaring Fork River (Class I trout stream)Freeze-thaw resistance: N_f = 1,280 cyclesChuteBioswaleSediment Basin

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

Chute Velocity Limit

V_max = √(2gΞ”h)
Result: 21.3 ft/s
Kept below threshold for incipient motion of D₉₀ rock

Sediment Basin Detention Time

t_d = V / Q_peak
Result: 4.8 min
Ensures >90% removal of particles >75 ΞΌm

Freeze-Thaw Cycle Resistance

N_f = (Οƒ_t / Οƒ_f)^m
Result: 1,280 cycles
Exceeds Aspen’s 500-cycle design life requirement

πŸ“Š Results

Zero sediment exceedances in 3 years of monitoring; 100% compliance with Colorado Water Quality Control Commission’s Class I standards; slope stabilization certified by USFS

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Rock chute joints require elastomeric sealants rated to βˆ’40Β°F
  • β€’Bioswale plants must survive 120+ days of snow cover
  • β€’Vortex separators require quarterly vacuum cleaning to maintain efficiency

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Rock chute joints require elastomeric sealants rated to βˆ’40Β°F
  • 2Bioswale plants must survive 120+ days of snow cover
  • 3Vortex separators require quarterly vacuum cleaning to maintain efficiency