π Case Study
Mountainous Ski Resort Stormwater Retrofit in Aspen, CO
Preventing erosion and sediment delivery to Roaring Fork River (Class I trout stream) under high-intensity snowmelt pulses and freeze-thaw cycles
ποΈ Project Overview
Upgrading 1970s-era concrete channels on 32Β° slopes serving base village and parking lots
π― Challenge
Preventing erosion and sediment delivery to Roaring Fork River (Class I trout stream) under high-intensity snowmelt pulses and freeze-thaw cycles
π§ Design Approach
Rock-lined stepped chutes with energy dissipators, bioswales with cold-tolerant vegetation (Carex spp.), and sediment basins with vortex separators
π Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
π Key Calculations
Chute Velocity Limit
V_max = β(2gΞh)
Result: 21.3 ft/s
Kept below threshold for incipient motion of Dββ rock
Sediment Basin Detention Time
t_d = V / Q_peak
Result: 4.8 min
Ensures >90% removal of particles >75 ΞΌm
Freeze-Thaw Cycle Resistance
N_f = (Ο_t / Ο_f)^m
Result: 1,280 cycles
Exceeds Aspenβs 500-cycle design life requirement
π Results
Zero sediment exceedances in 3 years of monitoring; 100% compliance with Colorado Water Quality Control Commissionβs Class I standards; slope stabilization certified by USFSπ‘ Lessons Learned
- β’Rock chute joints require elastomeric sealants rated to β40Β°F
- β’Bioswale plants must survive 120+ days of snow cover
- β’Vortex separators require quarterly vacuum cleaning to maintain efficiency
β Key Takeaways
- 1Rock chute joints require elastomeric sealants rated to β40Β°F
- 2Bioswale plants must survive 120+ days of snow cover
- 3Vortex separators require quarterly vacuum cleaning to maintain efficiency