π Case Study
Coastal Resilience Retrofit for Miami-Dade County Pump Station
Integrating sea-level rise projections into hydraulic grade line analysis without raising station elevation (space-constrained site)
ποΈ Project Overview
Upgrading aging 8000-gpm lift station to withstand 100-year SLR + storm surge + increased rainfall intensity
π― Challenge
Integrating sea-level rise projections into hydraulic grade line analysis without raising station elevation (space-constrained site)
π§ Design Approach
Dual-stage pumping with surge tanks, backflow-prevented outfalls, and AI-driven adaptive control logic tied to NOAA CO-OPS tide + NWS rainfall forecasts
π Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
π Key Calculations
Surge Tank Volume
V = Q Γ Ξt Γ SF
Result: 1,240 ftΒ³
For 15-min pump failure buffer at 100-yr surge + 20% intensity increase
HGL Under Surge
HGL = EL_pump + h_f + h_surge
Result: 12.8 ft NAVD88
Confirmed no reverse flow into intake
Adaptive Setpoint Adjustment
SP_t = SP_base + f(tide_level, rain_rate)
Result: Dynamic Β±3.2 ft range
Reduced overflow events by 91%
π Results
Operational through Hurricane Ian (2022); zero basement flooding in adjacent infrastructure; 42% energy savings via predictive stagingπ‘ Lessons Learned
- β’Static HGL analysis fails under compound flooding scenarios
- β’Surge tank sizing must account for concurrent surge + rainfall inflowβnot sequential
- β’AI control requires redundant manual override paths per FERC 2021 guidelines
β Key Takeaways
- 1Static HGL analysis fails under compound flooding scenarios
- 2Surge tank sizing must account for concurrent surge + rainfall inflowβnot sequential
- 3AI control requires redundant manual override paths per FERC 2021 guidelines