πŸ“‹ Case Study

Industrial Park Stormwater Master Plan in Indianapolis, IN

Achieving 90% annual phosphorus load reduction while accommodating truck traffic and hazardous material spill containment

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

320-acre logistics park with 87% impervious cover, legacy soils (HSG-C), and proximity to White River TMDL restrictions

🎯 Challenge

Achieving 90% annual phosphorus load reduction while accommodating truck traffic and hazardous material spill containment

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Phosphorus-sorbing filter media (Alum sludge + iron oxide) in forebays, constructed wetlands with emergent macrophytes, and spill-containment berms integrated with pretreatment vaults

πŸ“ Design Diagram

Inflow Pretreatment Vault V = 12,500 gal (110% max container) Spill Berm Forebay Alum sludge + Feβ‚‚O₃ E = 93.4% Wetland Emergent macrophytes A = 8.7 ac HLR-based design Outflow Phosphorus Removal Wetland Treatment Spill Containment Berms

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

P Removal Efficiency

E = 1 βˆ’ (C_out/C_in)
Result: 93.4%
Validated via 18-month synthetic runoff testing

Wetland Footprint

A = Q_annual / (HLR Γ— 365)
Result: 8.7 acres
Based on 0.5 cm/d HLR for P uptake

Spill Containment Volume

V = 110% Γ— max_container_volume
Result: 12,500 gal
Meets EPA SPCC Rule 40 CFR 112

πŸ“Š Results

Certified by IDEM as β€˜Tier 3’ BMP-compliant; eliminated need for off-site treatment; secured $1.8M Brownfield Revolving Loan

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Alum-based media requires pH buffering to prevent leaching
  • β€’Wetland performance drops >35% below 4Β°C β€” winter bypass required
  • β€’SPCC integration adds 11% upfront cost but avoids $420k/year insurance premiums

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Alum-based media requires pH buffering to prevent leaching
  • 2Wetland performance drops >35% below 4Β°C β€” winter bypass required
  • 3SPCC integration adds 11% upfront cost but avoids $420k/year insurance premiums